Thoughts on Browsers
The internet today is more important than ever. Having access to the internet is a necessity today and your choice of browser is the crucial tool for that. And while there are a number of browser options the web is absolutely dominated by Google at the moment. They’re in the position that Microsoft was in the late 90s with their dominance of the browser market with Internet Explorer and the Trident engine. Instead, we have Chrome, and the dozens of Chromium based browsers.
It’s frustrating and
concerning for a free and open web to have some of the largest corporations in
the world setting the course for the web through both direct and indirect
methods. And while the Chromium project itself is open source it is still largely
held to the whims of where Google wants to develop the web by being the largest
player. It’s a strange situation where even Microsoft has transitioned to
building their own browser to use Chromium as well for the past several years
with Edge. Even Opera moved to a Chromium-based engine, as well as some newer
browsers like Arc and Vivaldi. Safari is one of the few Webkit-based browsers with
any sort of noticeable market share for desktop and obviously is heavily
represented in the mobile space. The other holdout is Mozilla’s Firefox and browsers
built on its Gecko engine, like Pale Moon and their fork of Gecko called
Goanna.
I don’t trust and am
joined by many in tech fields as well in their distrust of the overwhelming
dominance of Chromium-based browsers in the desktop space. It results in a stagnation
of development and an increasingly myopic focus where the entire market is
limited by the limitations of that one engine. In particular, it has made the
web even more advertisement-focused than it already was. As Google has continued
to pull emphasis away from their search products and moved it to advertisement
it has made it of paramount importance for them to make online advertisements
as pervasive, and as resilient to ad blocking, as possible.
Their latest move to
try and gate off YouTube from users with ad blocking enabled is problematic at
best and damning to the accessibility of information at worst. It’s a tight
line to walk for a platform that is so heavily dependent on advertisement
revenue but it’s also a dark reminder for how ad blocking is even forced to be reported
by the browsers themselves to websites for what plugins are installed. The line
between the client and server analytics has been dramatically eroded over the
past several years and it’s a further step in the increasingly heavy-handed
push for advertisements and especially the data gathering that is involved with
those advertisements.
The increasing
concerns for security surrounding online advertising, and especially with
Google’s AdSense platform, is coming to a boil with all of these factors. They’ve
promoted malware advertisements, wittingly or otherwise, countless times over
the years. Even government organisations have recommended all users use ad
blockers because of how rampant data mining and malware are spreading via
advertisements. It’s not even the sheer obnoxious nature of online advertising
that is the biggest reason for using ad blockers, it’s the sheer glut of
malicious and outright dangerous software and data mining that are making it
such a large security concern.
Ultimately, I’m not really
sure where we can go from here. Firefox is the largest open-source non-Chromium-based
browser, and it has been slowly losing market share since the mid-2010s with it
dropping to below 7% this year. Safari is at roughly 12.5% of the desktop
space, meaning that more than 80% of the desktop browser market is Chromium-based,
with Chrome itself at over 64%, a number nearly identical in the mobile space
at just under 64%. It’s particularly concerning when factoring in that over 90%
of internet searches are also conducted via Google Search, with their largest
competitor Bing accounting for a tiny fraction of just 3%. It’s even more stark
on mobile where it’s nearly 95% of the search market.
I’m not going to get
into the decreasing quality of Google search results but that’s been another ballooning
concern for the past several years as well, with a larger and larger share of
the critical top results being either designated as advertisements or the
result of paid placement via Analytics. Getting good results now is harder than
it was 20 years ago and that’s honestly frightening when it comes to the implications
for access to information, and particularly to accurate information. It’s an
absolute mess and I do think that the current investigations into Google, Apple,
Amazon, and Microsoft for monopolisation practices as well as investigations
into those companies as well as Facebook and Twitter for the rampant
misinformation and disinformation that run rampant on their platforms is also
of critical importance.
My concern is that
this is all moving forward on the back heel, trying to play catch up to what is
ultimately a very dangerous blend for the stability of democratic nations. None
of this exists in a bubble and with the ubiquitous and ever-present nature of
the internet in the lives of literally billions of humans, having such
dangerous influences through unscrupulous actors who take advantage of the
state of these platforms is alarming. I’m hopeful that we will be able to
correct course and to break down these unconscionably powerful corporations
from how dangerously powerful they have become. I see some of that in the
growing push to open-source software and with the constant march forward for
platforms such as Linux and even Firefox, but we still have a long way to go.
The next several years will be crucial and it’s my hope that we will see a freer
and more open internet once again. But right now? Right now, it is very much in
Google’s court, the company that decided that “Don’t be evil” was a quaint and
antiquated ideal to strive for.
Comments
Post a Comment